Reasons why laws targeting specific breeds won’t work

Some canines, such as “pit bull types,” and others that people mistakenly believe are violent, are restricted or outlawed due to breed-specific legislation (BSL). Several municipalities and states in the United States and Canada have instituted breed-specific programs to lessen the number of dog bites. Despite its attractive appearance, BSL is not an effective or reliable way to reduce dog bites.

Any canine has the potential to bite.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that dogs attack more than 4.5 million people annually, with over 800,000 people requiring medical attention due to dog attacks; of this number, at least half are children. Bite wounds inflicted by dogs are a significant public health concern.

Numerous factors contribute to dog bites, dangerous dogs, and public safety. Bites can occur in any canine breed. Whether a dog will bite and produce significant bite damage depends on the dog’s history, temperament, size, the number of dogs involved, and the victim’s vulnerability. Placing limitations based on breed is a simplistic approach to a complex societal problem that could divert resources away from more efficient remedies.

One problem with breed-specific legislation
Regarding dangerous animal laws, the AVMA stands for local, state, and county initiatives that do not target specific breeds or classes. This law should protect people from dangerous animals.

For many reasons, it is not a good idea to restrict or outright ban certain breeds of dogs to avoid dog bites:

It might be challenging to apply breed-specific limitations when the dog’s breed is unknown or mixed.
Breed-specific legislation focuses frequently on characteristics rather than actual canine breeds. Even though “pit bulls” are generic, they are often the objects of breed-specific laws. A lot of people consider boxers, Rottweilers, and Dobermans to be illegal. But you can’t tell a dog’s breed or mix just by looking at it. Dogs are sometimes incorrectly labeled as “pit bulls,” according to studies conducted by Maddie’s Fund, a countrywide shelter initiative. Not even dog breed specialists can correctly determine the primary breed of a mix. There is a lack of precision and ease in implementing breed-specific limitations due to the difficulty in identifying dog breeds.

Responsible dog owners and their pets are unfairly targeted by breed-specific legislation.
Unfair assumptions about dog behavior based on looks hurt canines and their owners. Some responsible pet owners may feel pressured to relocate or give up their wonderful pets simply because of how they “look.” Unfortunately, BSL also has the power to euthanize innocent dogs. Also, “dangerous breed” dogs can serve in the police, military, rescue operations, and other service-related fields. Although these creatures are helpful to society, they are also victims of misconceptions and biases based on breed.

Problems with careless pet ownership persist despite breed bans.
Dogs are more prone to aggression if they are not socialized, neutered, and kept under close supervision. The importance of socialization and training for owners of other breeds is underappreciated, and banning a breed could mislead communities into thinking they are safe. Rather than confronting dangerous dog owners directly and implementing proven solutions such as leash laws and licensing requirements, local governments will waste their resources on ineffective breed-specific prohibitions and restrictions.

Breed biting rates cannot be computed or compared because of inaccurate data. Reason being:

  • Breeds of dogs that bite are frequently underreported or unrecognized.
  • When they don’t inflict serious harm, the bite count of a community is difficult to ascertain.
  • It is impossible to tell how many of a particular breed or mix of breeds are in any one area, as not all dogs have licenses.
  • Several incidents caused by animals are seldom accounted for in statistics.
  • Bite rates particular to breeds are unreliable since breed popularity changes. Little evidence links dog breeds to bite risk; nevertheless, characteristics related to good dog ownership, such as socialization, neutering, and appropriate confinement, significantly increase the likelihood of bites.

Enhanced measures to avoid dog bites
Legislation and animal control agencies should shift their attention away from the breed and toward encouraging good pet ownership and finding solutions for owners whose pets cause problems.

The AVMA recommends these measures to avoid dog bites:

  • Adopting broad, non-specific rules about dangerous dogs that aim to punish chronically careless owners
  • Animal control personnel with training strictly enforce leash regulations.
  • The goal is to end dog fighting and encourage the spaying or neutering of non-breeding canines.
  • Pet selection, maintenance, and bite prevention classes for kids and grownups